Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 16593 (2023 ) Cite this article Advantages Of Sputtering
Due to the resistance of some bacteria to antibiotics, research in the field of dealing with bacterial infections is necessary. A practical approach utilized in this study involves the preparation of an antibacterial thin film on the surfaces, which can effectively inhibit and reduce biofilm formation and bacterial adherence. In this study, we report the fabrication of bactericidal titanium (Ti) and copper (Cu) surfaces which involves a powerful co-sputtering method. This method provides a situation in which constituent elements are deposited simultaneously to control the composition of the thin film. Prepared samples were examined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle measurements. To evaluate antibacterial behavior, we used two bacterial strains Gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Antibacterial activity of the prepared sample was assessed by determining the number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) using a standard viable cell count assay. Results indicated that as the Cu concentration increased, the nanoscale surfaces became rougher, with roughness values rising from 11.85 to 49.65 nm, and the contact angle increased from 40 to 80 degrees, indicating a hydrophilic character. These factors play a significant role in the antibacterial properties of the surface. The Ti-Cu films displayed superior antibacterial ability, with a 99.9% reduction (equivalent to a 5-log reduction) in bacterial viability after 2 h compared to Ti alone against both bacterial strains. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images verified that both E. coli and S. aureus cells were physically deformed and damaged the bacterial cell ultrastructure was observed. These findings highlight that adding Cu to Ti can improve the antibacterial ability of the surface while inhibiting bacterial adherence. Therefore, the Ti14-Cu86 sample with the highest percentage of Cu had the best bactericidal rate. Investigation of toxicity of Cu-Ti thin films was conducted the using the MTT assay, which revealed their biocompatibility and absence of cytotoxicity, further confirming their potential as promising biomaterials for various applications.
Hiroshi Imamura, Yoichi Kamikoriyama, … Kiyoshi Kanie
Mayuresh Khot, Rahaman Sharif Shaik, … Amirkianoosh Kiani
Denver P. Linklater, Vladimir A. Baulin, … Elena P. Ivanova
Bacterial adhesion and subsequent colonization of the bacteria on surfaces is one of the main reasons for infections in medicine and the food industry1,2. Medical instruments, dental implants, orthopedic implants, artificial vessels, food packaging industries, and water purification systems are all exposed to these possible infections3,4,5,6,7,8. It can be said that the most concerning complication of the implantation of biological materials in the human body is infection related to biomaterials9. Therefore, prevention of infection and interrupting the mechanism of bacterial adherence to surfaces and removing them is necessary to prevent related problems effectively10,11,12.
Bacterial infections pose a significant threat to human health and cause various diseases. Over the years, antibiotics have played a crucial role in combating bacterial infections by benefiting from technological advancements and medical knowledge13. However, excessive and indiscriminate use of antibiotics has resulted in the development of antibiotic resistance among bacterial strains14. Antibiotic resistance has become a significant challenge in treating infections, making it increasingly difficult to find effective solutions15. To overcome antibiotic resistance, researchers have explored the effectiveness of metal nanoparticles (NPs) and nanocomposite thin films and coatings as potential antibiotics alternatives. These approaches combat bacterial infections through the controlled release of antimicrobial agents and the prevention of bacterial adherence to surfaces16,17,18,19.
For bacteria to adhere to the surface of a biomedical device, such as an implant, it is necessary for the bacteria to escape from the host implant’s defenses and adhere to it to form a microcolony and, finally a biofilm, which is a three-dimensional bacterial community20,21. Since destroying bacteria after biofilm formation is more challenging, preventing bacterial adhesion and creating biofilm is a more effective solution22. Various factors such as physicochemical properties, environmental conditions, and surface morphology effectively control biofilm formation23,24,25.
Undoubtedly, hindering the adhesion of bacteria to the surface and preventing biofilm formation is an essential challenge for researchers in developing antibacterial characters and their fabrication methods, which require intricate physical and chemical mechanisms26,27,28. In addition to using antibacterial compounds, designing and modifying surface properties to prevent biofilm formation is another effective strategy to overcome surface-adherent bacterial contamination29,30,31. Surface properties such as roughness32,33, wettability34, pattern35, and surface energy36, play essential roles in bacterial adhesion.
The effect impact of surface roughness, an important surface characteristic, on bacterial adhesion differs depending on the roughness scale37. At the nanoscale level, surfaces with roughness exhibit the best anti-adhesion properties, whereas at the micro-scale level, rougher surfaces tend to promote bacterial adhesion38. The difference in bacterial adhesion is due to the contact points to which the bacteria can adhere39. Generally, bacteria prefer smoother surfaces at a nanometer scale that provide them with an opportunity to grow and produce a significant amount of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), which aids in their survival40,41. Lüdecke et al. showed that a slight change in the roughness parameter (RMS) of the TiO2 coating can decrease the adherence of Escherichia coli (E. coli)42. Moreover, other research reports have suggested that surface roughness can control colony forming of the bacteria on Ti-based dental implants43. Jang et al. investigated the effect of surface roughness on bacterial adhesion to nitinol (NiTi) wire surfaces. Their results demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial adhesion by polishing the surfaces to a nano-level roughness44. Petrini et al. examined the surface characteristics of two Ti6Al4V surfaces produced by selective laser melting (SLM) and treated with electrochemical (EL) polishing, and organic acid etching (OEA). The OEA samples showed higher nano roughness, improved wettability, and reduced bacterial biofilm formation compared to the machined and EL samples45. However, investigating the surface roughness and its effect on the antibacterial mechanism in the nanoscale presents numerous challenges and questions that need to be clarified as a new research scope.
Additionally, wetting is considered another influential factor in the adhesion of bacteria on surfaces, as it can either prevent colony growth or accelerate it46. Surface wettability is typically obtained by contact angle measurement techniques, which usually show that a higher level of bioactivity is associated with a lower contact angle of the hydrophilic surfaces. This is an essential factor in determining the tissue compatibility of biomaterials47. Of course, the issue of bacterial adherence on hydrophilic surfaces is controversial and ambiguous. Some studies have reported anti-adhesion properties for hydrophilic surfaces, while others have reported cell adhesion on such surfaces48,49,50.
An ideal antibacterial surface exhibits two main properties: prevention of bacterial adherence, and bacterial elimination51. In addition, biocompatibility, non-toxicity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness are other essential considerations for the fabrication, modification, and use of antibacterial surfaces and coatings52.
Titanium (Ti) is widely utilized in the biomedical industry owing to its antibacterial properties, significant corrosion resistance, and mechanical properties53. Moreover, these promising properties, the addition of metals such as aluminum (Al), copper (Cu), gold (Au), and silver (Ag) improve and enhance biocompatibility of Ti. Cu to its distinct chemical and physical properties can hold excellent promise as an antibacterial material, alongside Ti54. However, according to the significant advancements in understanding the antibacterial potential of different Ti alloys, it is imperative to conduct further research to comprehend their surface properties. So, there is a need for a comprehensive investigation into the effect of Cu, and its concentration impact on the nanoscale roughness and wettability parameters, which remains an unexplored subject in the field of antibacterial properties.
Recently, various approaches such as spray deposition, spin-coating, sol–gel, acid etching, anodic oxidation, physical vapor deposition (PVD), and electrodeposition have been employed to modify antibacterial surfaces, and alter their surface properties, and topology55. Among these methods, magnetron sputtering has been shown in several studies to be a suitable and feasible way to modify antibacterial coatings56,57,58. This method offers an excellent opportunity to produce homogeneous, smooth, and dense coatings with a rapid deposition rate, thereby increasing the coating-substrate adherence59,60. Additionally, multicomponent composite layers can be formed with precise control of the component concentrations by the magnetron co-sputtering61,62,63,64,65. For instance, previous research has demonstrated the successful use of TiN radio frequency sputtering in the coating of Ti-25Ta-xZr nanotube alloys for use in dental implants66. In addition, titanium boron nitride thin films suitable for use as protective coatings for metallic implants were fabricated using pulsed DC magnetron sputtering67. Magnetron sputtering was used to deposit Ti-Me intermetallic (Me = Al, Cu, Ag, Au) thin films, which were then characterized to assess their potential for use as biopotential electrodes in noninvasive physiological monitoring68. These examples highlight the broad range of biomedical devices that can benefit from this coating technique to, biocompatibility, durability, and functionality.
This paper presents the preparation of Ti–Cu films involving different ratios of Cu to Ti, and examines their antibacterial performance, which shows excellent antibacterial properties. Magnetron co-sputtering method was employed to fabricate these films. The primary objective of this study was to establish a significant relationship between the percentage of constituent elements and surface characteristics, such as the surface roughness and wettability of Ti-Cu thin films. By assessing the impact of Ti-Cu thin films on bacterial adhesion and gaining a clearer understanding of their antibacterial properties, we aimed to contribute to the knowledge in this field.
First, the glass slides (Medical Lab Unground Edges Microscopy Glass Slide 7102) were prepared as substrates. They were cut in dimensions of 1 × 1cm. Then, they were sonicated in deionized water, ethanol, and acetone for 15 min, respectively, and subsequently dried by a thermal dryer. The silicon (Si) substrate was also prepared using the same method and utilized for specific characterization analyses.
The Ti-Cu thin films were deposited on glass and Si substrates using the co-sputtering method with a Desk Sputter Coater DST3-A (Nanostructure Coating Co.). Radiofrequency (RF) magnetron sputtering was used for the Ti target (99.9 at. % purity), while direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering was employed for the Cu target (99.9 at. % purity). The schematic representation of Ti-Cu thin film preparation through the co-sputtering method is shown in Fig. 1. Before film deposition, both metal targets were pre-sputtered for 5 min to remove contaminations and oxide layers. The base pressure was 9 × 10–5 Torr, and the argon (Ar) flow rate was 33 sccm (standard cubic centimeter per minute). The Ti-Cu thin films with various elemental percentages were named as follows: Ti, Ti81-Cu19, Ti49-Cu51, Ti29-Cu71, and Ti14-Cu86, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the voltage and current applied to the Cu target and other deposition parameters used to prepare Ti-Cu thin films.
Schematic images of the preparation of Ti-Cu thin films using the co-sputtering method.
The elemental compositions of prepared thin films on Si substrates were examined using energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy with field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) from Zeiss Co. (Germany), and MIRA3 TESCAN, respectively. Five different elemental measurements and EDX maps were taken for each thin film, and the average values were reported. The thickness of the thin films was also investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) from TESCAN VEGA//XMU. The structural properties of the deposited coatings were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) with an X' Pert Pro instrument from Panalytical Co. (UK) and Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406). The Grazing incidence XRD (GIXRD) technique was employed with a low grazing angle of 1°. The topography and roughness of the surface were evaluated with the atomic force microscopy (AFM) by the ARA-AFM model, Ara Research Co. A sample area of 5 × 5 μm2 was scanned in the non-contact mode. The contact angle method was used to determine the wettability of the surface. Water drops were placed on the thin film samples, and the image of the drop was taken by the camera. The contact angle of the samples was measured with a digital light microscopy DINOLITE-AM model 4113ZT made in Taiwan and a 10 µL Hamilton syringe (USA). Typically, droplets with volumes ranging from 1 to 10 µL are employed for contact angle measurements.
The antibacterial properties of Ti-Cu thin films with varying concentrations of Cu against S. aureus ATCC 6538, and E. coli ATCC 25,922 were evaluated using the colony-forming units (CFU/ml) assay. The direct contact method was used to determine the viable cell count. The experiment was conducted at four different time points: 30 min, 2 h, 6 h, and 24h. Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) was used as the solid culture medium, while Muller Hinton Broth (MHB) was used as the liquid culture medium. The bacterial suspension was prepared with a concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/ml in a dilution solution of phosphate buffer. A volume of 1.0 ml of the suspension was placed on the sample surfaces and were incubated at 35°C ± 2 °C. Then, 0.1 ml of the suspension was taken in 30 min, 2 h, 6 h, and 24 h and cultured on TSA agar using the plate spread method. The plates were then incubated at 35°C ± 2 °C for 48 h. The humidity level was set at 90% throughout the experiment, providing an optimal environment for bacterial growth. The number of colonies formed on the plates was counted using a colony counter. The CFU/ml was calculated using the following equation:
The antibacterial activity can be determined using the below formula:
In this formula, a represents the number of CFU/ml on the surface of the reference sample, while B represents the number of CFU/ml on the surface of the treated sample.
The percentage of bacterial and logarithmic reduction were calculated based on the CFU/ml. This work follows National Standard No. 10900, derived from ISO 22196:2011, and provided a method for measuring the antibacterial activity of plastics and other non-porous surfaces69.
FESEM images can be crucial in investigating and identifying antibacterial agents, by providing high-quality images. These images help determine the details of bacterial variations, such as the state of the cell membrane, structure, and distribution of bacteria in response to antibacterial agents. The Ti49-Cu51 and Ti14-Cu86 thin films, which are antibacterial substances were exposed to E. coli and S. aureus bacteria, as described in the previous section. First, the bacterial suspension is carefully dropped onto a filter membrane, such as a polycarbonate “nuclepore” filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm or 0.2 µm. The droplets are then allowed to air dry. The dried bacterial samples on the filter membrane are fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS buffer for 45 min, followed by an additional 1 h fixation period. After fixation, the samples are rinsed for 15 min in PBS buffer to remove any residual fixative. The samples are further fixed by immersing them in 1% OsO4 in PBS buffer for 1 h to enhance contrast and preserve the cellular structure. For dehydration, the samples undergo a series of ethanol rinses, 10 min each in 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, and 100% ethanol. These rinses progressively remove water from the samples. The dehydrated samples are then immersed in absolute ethanol for approximately 15 min to ensure complete water removal. Critical-point drying was performed to transition the samples from the liquid to the gas phase while preserving their structure. The samples were placed in a critical point drying apparatus, where the chamber pressure and temperature were adjusted to reach the critical point of a suitable liquid, such as carbon dioxide (CO2). To ensure a gentle drying process without causing sample distortion or damage. To prevent the accumulation of electric charge on the surface, the dehydrated and dried samples were covered with a thin film, approximately 20 nm, conductive layer of gold. The gold coating was deposited using a suitable sputter coater system model DSR1. The exact sputtering parameters, such as the sputtering time, power, and pressure, are 300 s, 27%, and 90 \(\times {10}^{-3}\) Torr, respectively. Finally, the prepared samples are ready for FE-SEM analysis. The samples were loaded into a FESEM (MIRA3 TESCAN(, and imaged at high resolution to investigate the bacterial morphology and other sample features.
The cytotoxicity of the samples was evaluated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay to assess their biocompatibility. This commonly used method measures the viability of cells by converting MTT dye into purple formazan crystals within the mitochondria. The concentration of the dye is proportional to the number of viable cells, allowing for quantification with a photometer. The methodology and evaluation criteria of this assay adhere to the ISO standard 2009:5-1099370.
In this study, we tested samples Ti81-Cu19 and Ti14-Cu86, representing the lowest and highest percentages of Cu, respectively. The samples were sterilized using the UV method before were examined. Control samples (wells with no treatment) and wells containing samples Ti81-Cu19 and Ti14-Cu86 were used to establish the baseline cytotoxicity level using the MTT assay. To perform the assay, 1 × 104 L929 cell samples were seeded in 12-well plates with DMEM culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin, and streptomycin. This experimental setup was performed thrice. Subsequently, the samples Ti81-Cu19 and Ti14-Cu86 were added to the respective wells, also in triplicate. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C with 5% carbon dioxide for 24 ± 2 h to allow cell-surface interaction. At specified intervals, 100 µL of MTT dye with a 5 mg/ml concentration was added to each well. After 3 h, the purple-colored crystals were dissolved using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The amount of dissolved color in the DMSO solution was measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader. Higher optical density (OD) values indicate wells with viable cells compared to wells with dead cells. By comparing the optical density of the test samples to the control samples using the following formula:
By employing this formula, the relative viability of the test samples can be determined compared to the control sample and we can provide insights into their cytotoxicity.
We repeated the magnetron sputtering coating process multiple times for each percentage and created several thin layers. Every thin film was tested at least thrice under the same conditions for EDX, antibacterial, and MTT tests. To analyze the obtained data and determine the significant differences among the groups, we employed Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05). This statistical method allowed for the comparison of means and identification of significant variations. Statistical analysis of each measurement was calculated using Origin software and it’s presented in Tables 1S–3S in the Supplementary file.
The elemental analysis of samples involved the evaluation Ti and Cu values using the EDX technique. The analysis was conducted on all thin films coated by co-sputtering on a pure Si substrate. For instance, the EDX spectrum of the Ti49-Cu51 thin film is shown in Fig. 2a, while the remaining EDX spectra can be found in Figs. 1S–4S. The percentage of atom and mass of each samples were listed in Table 2. The peaks for Si and O are related to the elements present in the Si substrate. Similarly, the peaks observed for Ti and Cu confirm the presence of these elements and provide their quantities in all samples. To ensure the homogeneous distribution and absence of agglomeration of Ti and Cu particles, the analysis was repeated on 5 points on all sample surfaces. For example, the mapping spectrum of the Ti49-Cu51 thin film can be found in Fig. 2b, which confirms the uniform distribution of Ti and Cu elements in the prepared samples and agrees with the EDX results. Additionally, Fig. 3. presents a cross-section SEM image of the Ti49-Cu51 thin film sample, providing an estimate of its thickness, which ranges from 160 to 200nm. The raw data of the SEM image is given in Fig. 5S of the Supplementary file.
(a) EDX spectra and (b) Elemental mapping of the sample Ti49-Cu51.
The SEM image of the cross-section view of the sample Ti49-Cu51.
The Grazing X-ray diffraction spectra of the deposited Ti-Cu thin films on a glass substrate with different ratios of Cu to Ti are demonstrated in Fig. 4. It was determined that all binary Ti-Cu thin films had amorphous structures, as there were no Bragg diffraction peaks visible. The peaks at around 2ϴ = 21° could be related to the substrate71. The raw data of the GIXRD is given in Fig. 6S of the Supplementary file.
GIXRD pattern of the Ti-Cu thin films on the glass substrate.
The antibacterial properties of Ti-Cu thin films were thoroughly investigated using the CFU/ml analysis. The aim of this analysis to examine the survival of the Gram-positive Bacterial S. aureus and the Gram-negative Bacterial E. coli at varying exposure times, as illustrated in Fig. 5a–d. In this method, the percentage of bacteria reduction is computed by comparing the number of bacteria before (ni) and after (nf) treatment with an antibacterial agent, using the following equation:
(a) CFU/ml analysis graph for E. coli bacteria (b) Photographic images of E. coli antibacterial agar plate counting test in 30 min and 2 h (c) CFU/ml analysis graph for S. aureus bacteria (d) Photographic images of S. aureus antibacterial agar plate counting test in 30 min and 2 h. The data shown are representative of (n = 3) repeats.
For E. coli bacteria, as shown in Fig. 5a and b, after 30 min, bacteria started to be killed, and after 2 h, the percentage reduction of bacteria reached over 99% for samples containing Cu and Ti. However, for Ti samples alone, the percentage reduction of bacteria is less than 5% after 24 h. Based on the alterations curves in Fig. 5a, Ti14-Cu86 thin film has a steeper slope than the other samples, indicating a faster antibacterial process. Ti29-Cu71 and Ti81-Cu19 thin films have almost equal slopes and similar trends, while sample Ti49-Cu51 has the slowest bactericidal process compared to the other samples. Additionally, the visual evidence in Fig. 5b supports the antibacterial findings, showing photographs of agar plates with E. coli colonies after 30 min and 2 h of incubation. It can be seen that bacterial colonies decrease almost with the increase in Cu percentage. For S. aureus bacteria, which are shown in Fig. 5c and d, similar results were obtained. According to Fig. 5c, sample Ti14-Cu86 has the highest percentage of Cu, and has the highest bactericidal rate in 2 h, in contrast, samples Ti29-Cu71 and Ti49-Cu51 have almost the same trend, and sample Ti81-Cu19 lowest bactericidal rate. The percentage of bacterial reduction in the Ti sample alone is less than 5% in 2 h, while the samples containing Cu in contact with S. aureus bacteria are more than 99%. Figure 5a and c demonstrates that the presence of Ti layers alone resulted in a reduction of S. aureus, while no significant changes are observed in the case of E. coli. This discrepancy can be attributed to specific surface interactions72 and species-specific responses73 that play a crucial role in the antimicrobial activity of Ti layers against these two bacterial species. Moreover, S. aureus and E. coli possess distinct defense mechanisms and adaptive responses, influencing their susceptibility to the antimicrobial effects of the Ti layers74.
The mechanism through which Cu exerts its antimicrobial effects is multifaceted and involves several key factors16,75. One of the primary mechanisms consists of the release of Cu ions from the surface76. Cu exists in the body and biological environments in two oxidation states Cu1+ and Cu2+. Cu1+ ions are the most active form of Cu ions, and reducing the number of Cu2+ ions allows them to enter the bacterial membrane77. When the number of Cu2+ ions decreases, Ti-Cu thin films better fulfill their role as a killing agent against target bacteria. Because of Cu1+ ions play the main role in killing bacteria in our Ti-Cu thin films. The absorption of Cu1+ ions pierces the membrane, and the secretions resulting from this eventually kill the bacteria. The reduction of Cu2+ ions is done by performing the following reactions78. These reactions occur when Ti-Cu thin films are exposed to bacteria during incubation conditions.
The explanation states that the amino acids present in the environment during the incubation process react with Cu2+ ions according to the chemical equations mentioned above, leading to their consumption. These equations demonstrate that the amino acids in the environment facilitate the release of Cu2+ ions from the surface of Ti-Cu thin films, allowing them to interact with the surrounding environment. As a result, Cu1+ ions remain on the surface of the layers. Finally, these ions are in direct contact with the bacteria, are absorbed by its outer membrane, and react with this membrane according to the electronegative tendencies of the element. This causes a hole in the bacterial membrane, ultimately leading to its demise79.
Additionally, Cu can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) through redox reactions. ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals, possess strong oxidizing properties that can damage bacterial cells. The production of ROS by Cu further enhances its antimicrobial activity76. Moreover, Cu has been found to interfere with biofilm formation, which plays a crucial role in bacterial resistance. Cu ions disrupt the extracellular matrix of biofilms, preventing their formation and rendering them more susceptible to antimicrobial agents80. In our study, we observed that incorporation Cu into Ti surfaces enhanced their antibacterial properties compared to Ti alone.
As we know, the Gram-positive bacteria membrane is thicker than the Gram-negative bacteria membrane81. Since the weight percentage of Cu and then the concentration of Cu1+ ions82 (as an antibacterial agent) are the same in Ti81-Cu19 thin films against these two kinds of bacteria, in Fig. 5a, it can be observed that these layers effectively fulfill their antibacterial role as a killer agent in the exposure of E. coli bacteria, similar to other layers. This behavior shows that the given amount of Cu and the concentration of Cu1+ ions is sufficient to eliminate all E. coli bacteria in the environment. However, as seen in Fig. 5c, Ti81-Cu19 thin films do not exhibit the same efficiency against S. aureus bacteria compared to other layers. This reduction efficiently can be attributed the thicker membrane of S. aureus bacteria when exposed to these layers. This can be explained by the fact that all the Cu1+ ions in the environment, when exposed to the thick membrane of S. aureus bacteria, are consumed and unable to eliminate them. Therefore, as seen in the CFU/ml analysis graph, we observe a bacteriostatic behavior. Figure 5d confirms these results with photographs of plates at 30 min and 2 h for S. aureus bacteria. After only 30 min of contact, a significant antibacterial effect was observed. Based on the obtained results, it is possible to see the prominent role of Cu metal compared to Ti metal in its antibacterial properties.
This was evident through the notable reduction in bacterial viability and observable physical deformation of bacterial cells on the Ti-Cu films. The images related to E. coli and S. aureus antibacterial agar plate counting test at 6 h and 24 h for each thin film can be found in Figs. 7S and 8S of Supplementary Information, respectively.
In addition to CFU/ml analysis, FESEM images were used for the antibacterial assay of thin films, as depicted in Figs. 6 and 7. It is important to note that CFU/ml analysis not only measures bacterial quantity but also serves as a determinant of bacterial viability. The inclusion of CFU/ml analysis, along with FESEM images, in our antibacterial assay offers a holistic approach for assessing both quantitative viability measurements and visually confirming bacterial presence and structure. As shown in Fig. 6a–d, FESEM images demonstrate the morphological changes of E. coli bacteria on Ti49-Cu51 and Ti14-Cu86 thin films at different resolutions. The Ti49-Cu51 thin film in Fig. 6a, several bacteria with relatively damaged membranes are visible, indicated by red arrows. However, in the higher-resolution FESEM images in Fig. 6b, the perforated membrane of E. coli bacteria is more prominently highlighted by the red arrow. The Ti14-Cu86 thin film, which has the highest percentage of Cu among the samples, Fig. 6c shows that the bacteria are mostly killed, with the degraded membranes indicated by a red arrow. In the higher-resolution Fig. 6d, the degradation of the E. coli membrane after 30 min is depicted, as indicated by the red arrow. Based on the CFU/ml results and FESEM images, it can be concluded that the Ti14-Cu86 sample, with the highest percentage of Cu among the samples, exhibits the best antibacterial performance.
FESEM images of E. coli bacteria in the presence of Ti49-Cu51 thin film in scale (a) 2 μm (b) 1 μm and Ti14-Cu86 thin film in scale (c) 2 μm (d) 1 μm.
FESEM images of S. aureus bacteria in the presence of Ti49-Cu51 thin film in scale (a) 5 μm (b) 500 nm and Ti14-Cu86 thin film in scale (c) 5 μm (d) 500 nm.
Figure 7a–d displays FESEM images of S. aureus bacteria on Ti49-Cu51 and Ti14-Cu86 samples after 30 min exposure, captured at different resolutions. In Fig. 7a, some S. aureus bacteria with a damaged membrane remain on the Ti49-Cu51 sample, indicated by the yellow arrow. Figure 7b, at the higher resolution, reveals bacteria with perforated and destroyed membranes. In Fig. 7c and d, for the Ti14-Cu86 sample, destroyed membrane of S. aureus bacteria at two resolutions, respectively, indicated by the yellow arrow. Only a few bacteria with damaged membrane can be seen in Fig. 7c and d, which shows the excellent antibacterial rate of Ti14-Cu86 thin film compared to other samples. FESEM images of the control, related to E. coli and S. aureus bacteria, are presented in Figs. 9S and 10S in the Supplementary file, respectively. These images effectively show the expected appearance and structure of the cells under favorable conditions, confirming that the sample preparation process for FE-SEM did not cause any detrimental effects on the bacterial cells. The raw data of the FESEM image is given in Figs. 11S and 12S in the Supplementary file.
The surface topography and coating quality of the prepared thin films were investigated using AFM imaging. Figure 8a–e demonstrated AFM topographic 2D and 3D maps of the prepared thin films. The representative 3D maps of the thin film surface confirm the homogeneity and lack of cracks. It can be observed that the surface roughness increases relative to the amount of Cu. The roughness RMS parameters were calculated within a small surface area (5 × 5 µm2). The Ti, Ti81-Cu19, Ti49-Cu51, Ti29-Cu71, and Ti14-Cu86 coatings have RMS values of 11.85, 23.42, 49.65, 47.99, and 46.81 nm, respectively. In this study, Ti14-Cu86, Ti29-Cu71, and Ti49-Cu51 samples, depicted in Fig. 8c, d, and e, respectively, exhibit roughness between 46 and 49 nm and demonstrate better antibacterial properties compared to Ti and Ti81-Cu19 samples, which have a roughness of 11–23 nm shown in Fig. 8a and b, respectively. To further elucidate the demonstrated topography across the surface and provide visual representations of the surface features, line profiles are included in the Supplementary file (Figs. 13S-17S).
AFM topographic 2D and 3D maps of (a) Ti (i,ii), (b) Ti81-Cu19 (i,ii), (c) Ti49-Cu51(i,ii), (d) Ti29-Cu71(i,ii), and (e) Ti14-Cu86 (i,ii) thin films.
Surfaces that exhibit nanoscale roughness, particularly when combined with a sufficient amount of antibacterial agents such as Cu, offer potential benefits for antibacterial applications. As shown in schematic Fig. 9a, when the surface is smooth and lacks roughness, bacteria naturally adhere to it. However, when the surface features a nanoscale roughness structure, as depicted in Fig. 9b, bacteria tend to have increased contact with the surface. Increasing contact surface can lead to elongation and rupture of the cell membrane, ultimately destroying the bacteria. Consequently, surfaces with higher nanoscale roughness can inhibit cell proliferation and biofilm formation due to the alterations in the shape of the bacterial membrane83.
Schematic views of the cell membrane contact with (a (the smooth surface and (b) surface with nanoscale roughness.
As shown in Fig. 10a and b, the water contact angles of prepared thin films on the glass substrate were determined using the sessile drop method. As observed, the Ti thin layer exhibited a lower contact angle of about 40 degrees. In contrast, the contact angle of the sample Ti14-Cu86 with a higher percentage of Cu increased to 80 degrees. The 90-degree cut-off point for hydrophobicity is depicted by the horizontal line in Fig. 10b. Any value above this line indicates a hydrophobic surface. In contrast, values below it denote a hydrophilic surface. It was observed that the Ti thin film exhibited a contact angle of about 40 degrees, indicating a hydrophilic surface. In contrast, the contact angle increased to around 80 degrees with a higher percentage of Cu in Ti-Cu thin films, indicating a tendency to a hydrophobic behavior. Additionally, it was noted that the antibacterial properties of the thin film improved with an increase in Cu percentage. This finding indicates that increasing the Cu content, acting as an antibacterial agent, leads to an increase in the contact angle, effectively reducing bacterial adherence to the surface.
(a) Sessile drop contact angle measurement of deionized water on the prepared thin films on a glass surface (b) Results of the contact angle measurements.
To assess the potential cytotoxicity of Cu-Ti thin films, an MTT test was conducted on L929 cells cultured with the thin films for 24 ± 2 h. The results, as illustrated in Fig. 11a–d, according to cell viability exceeding 70% across all experimental groups, no evidence of cytotoxicity demonstrated. Specifically, L929 cells exhibited an average survival rate of 93.28% on Ti81-Cu19 and 83.80% on Ti14-Cu86 after 24 ± 2 h of culture. The difference in survival and proliferation between the Ti81-Cu19 and Ti14-Cu86 samples, representing the lowest and highest percentages of Cu, respectively, was only 10%. It is believed that these samples while killing the bacteria, at the same time they release no cytotoxic particulate debris from the thin films, indicating that the magnetron sputtered specimens used in this study are biocompatible.
(a) the outcomes of the MTT test and images of cells after exposure to the (b) control, (c) Ti81-Cu19, (d) and Ti14-Cu86 samples following a 24 ± 2 h period (n = 3). The average value of each parameter was evaluated using Duncan’s method (P < 0.05).
Furthermore, it is important to note that both Ti and Cu are commonly employed metals in various medical applications. Extensive studies have examined the potential toxicity of Ti in human cells to confirm its safety. These investigations consistently demonstrate that Ti is generally non-toxic and suitable for human applications84. On the other hand, Cu is an essential element crucial for various biological processes, including enzymatic activity, redox reactions, and cellular signaling within the body85. Considering the dimensions of the samples, which consisted of nanoscale thin layers with a weight percentage of Cu, a 1 × 1 cm2 sample coated with 200 nm Ti14-Cu86 (having the highest weight percentage of Cu at 85.97% among the samples) contains 0.017 mg of Cu according to the weight percentage relationship. The literature suggests that the natural presence of Cu in an adult human weighing approximately 70 kg ranges from 75 to 100 mg78. These findings provide substantial evidence supporting the safe use of Ti-Cu-based materials in the context of biomaterials.
In this study, we describe the fabrication of a bactericidal surface through the combination of Ti and Cu. Our approach involves a powerful Co-sputtering method, allowing us to tailor the antibacterial properties of the surface by adjusting the relative proportions of Ti and Cu. The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing efforts to develop effective antibacterial strategies and combat antibiotic resistance. Traditional antibiotics are losing effectiveness due to the adaptation and proliferation of resistant strains, making it imperative to explore alternative approaches to combat bacterial infections86.
Testing materials for their antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties is crucial, particularly in the context of combating bacterial infections and antibiotic resistance87. When assessing antimicrobial activity, researchers typically conduct tests to evaluate the efficacy of a substance or material inhibiting growth bacteria. These tests involve exposing bacteria to the material and measuring how much bacterial growth is inhibited. On the other hand, evaluating antibiofilm activity involves evaluating a substance’s ability to prevent or disrupt biofilm formation. This is essential because biofilms exhibit high resistance to antibiotics88. Various techniques are used to test antibiofilm properties, including quantifying biofilm biomass, measuring the viability of bacteria within the biofilm, and assessing the structural integrity of the biofilm matrix89,90. These tests play a crucial role in developing new materials, coatings, or compounds to combat bacterial infections, particularly those associated with biofilms. Biofilms, which involve bacteria enclosed in a protective extracellular matrix, are highly resistant to antibiotics91,92. This resistance can be attributed to two factors. First, the biofilm matrix acts as a physical barrier, restricting the penetration of antibiotics and limiting their effectiveness. Additionally, the dense structure of biofilms hinders the diffusion of drugs, further reducing their ability to reach all the bacterial cells93,94. Second, biofilms contain a subpopulation of bacteria known as persister cells, which exhibit a dormant or slow-growing state that renders them highly tolerant to antibiotics. Once the antibiotic treatment ceases, persister cells can revitalize and repopulate the biofilm, leading to recurrent infections95.
Surface modification has emerged as a promising strategy to inhibit biofilm formation and bacterial adherence in implants. By altering the properties of surfaces, such as their composition or topography, it is possible to create antibacterial surfaces that prevent bacterial colonization and growth. Ti14-Cu86 thin film has demonstrated exceptional antibacterial performance, surpassing many other Cu and Ti-based coatings, as shown in Table 3. This outstanding antibacterial efficacy can be attributed to the unique structure and the relative Cu-Ti ratio of the films. These findings highlight the potential of Ti14-Cu86 thin film for various biomaterial applications, including dental and bone implants, due to their antibacterial properties. When comparing our results with the existing literature, significant improvements in antibacterial performance have been achieved. Notably, our Ti-Cu thin films reached 99.9% reduction bacteria, surpassing values reported for similar composites such as Cu and Ti additives96. Additionally, the thin films exhibited rapid antibacterial activity, outperforming previous Cu and Ti-based surfaces97. These results emphasize the effectiveness of the sputtering method in fabricating high performance layers for biodevices.
This work presents a practical strategy, for preparing high-performance antibacterial Ti-Cu surfaces. The co-sputtering technique was employed to deposit antibacterial thin films within a thickness of 160-200nm on glass substrates. XRD spectroscopy showed an amorphous structure, and EDX confirmed the percentage of elements in each thin film. According to the CFU/ml analysis, a 99.9% decrease in bacteria was observed after 2 h of exposure to Gram-negative and positive bacteria strains using Ti-Cu thin films. Additionally, FESEM images confirmed the destruction of the cell membrane in both bacterial strains after only 30 min of exposure. The topography of AFM maps showed that Cu-containing thin films have more nanoscale roughness than bare Ti thin films. This increased roughness can effectively contribute to the destruction of bacterial cell membranes and inhibit bacterial adherence. Additionally, as the percentage of Cu increases, the contact angle increases, leading to improved antibacterial properties. This is because a higher contact angle on the surface makes it more difficult for bacteria to adhere, inhibiting their growth. Therefore, this study demonstrates that increasing the percentage of Cu can improve antibacterial activity by modifying surface properties such as roughness and wettability. The results of our study demonstrate the biocompatibility and lack of cytotoxicity of Cu-Ti thin films, further supporting their potential as safe and effective materials for biomedical applications. Given the significant challenges posed by infectious contamination, our study contributes to the expanding research on using the magnetron sputtering method to enhance antimicrobial activity on surfaces, presenting promising findings.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this submitted article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Setter, O. P., Jiang, X. & Segal, E. Rising to the surface: Capturing and detecting bacteria by rationally-designed surfaces. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 83, 102969 (2023).
Manna, S., Baindara, P. & Mandal, S. M. Molecular pathogenesis of secondary bacterial infection associated to viral infections including SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. Public Health 13, 1397–1404 (2020).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, S. W., Phillips, K. S., Gu, H., Kazemzadeh-Narbat, M. & Ren, D. How microbes read the map: Effects of implant topography on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Biomaterials 268, 120595 (2021).
Ramstedt, M. & Burmølle, M. Can multi-species biofilms defeat antimicrobial surfaces on medical devices?. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 22, 100370 (2022).
Peng, L. et al. Hydrogel-coated dental device with adhesion-inhibiting and colony-suppressing properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 9718–9725 (2020).
Falk-Brynhildsen, K., Söderquist, B., Friberg, Ö. & Nilsson, U. G. Bacterial recolonization of the skin and wound contamination during cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial of the use of plastic adhesive drape compared with bare skin. J. Hosp. Infect. 84, 151–158 (2013).
Bordbar-Khiabani, A. & Gasik, M. Electrochemical and biological characterization of Ti–Nb–Zr–Si alloy for orthopedic applications. Sci. Rep. 13, 2312 (2023).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Diedrich, C. M. et al. Transvaginal mesh-related complications and the potential role of bacterial colonization: An exploratory observational study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 30, 205–215 (2023).
Diefenbeck, M. et al. Gentamicin coating of plasma chemical oxidized titanium alloy prevents implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. Biomaterials 101, 156–164 (2016).
Giorgi, F., Curran, J. M. & Patterson, E. A. Real-time monitoring of the dynamics and interactions of bacteria and the early-stage formation of biofilms. Sci. Rep. 12, 18146 (2022).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Feng, G. & Moraru, C. I. Micro-and nanotopography sensitive bacterial attachment mechanisms: A review. Front. Microbiol. 10, 191 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Han, A., Tsoi, J. K. H., Rodrigues, F. P., Leprince, J. G. & Palin, W. M. Bacterial adhesion mechanisms on dental implant surfaces and the influencing factors. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 69, 58–71 (2016).
Karami, P. et al. Molecular characterization of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in a burn center. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 26, 1731–1736 (2019).
Jain, P. et al. High prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistance in clinical E. coli isolates from Bangladesh and prediction of molecular resistance determinants using WGS of an XDR isolate. Sci. Rep. 11, 22859 (2021).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghasemi, M. R. et al. In vitro antibacterial activity and wound healing effects of Achillea millefolium essential oil in rat. J. Pharmacopunct. 26, 167 (2023).
Khan, J. et al. Ternary metal (Cu–Ni–Zn) oxide nanocomposite via an environmentally friendly route. ACS Omega 8, 21032–21041 (2023).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rahimi, J., Bahrami, N., Niksefat, M., Kamalzare, M. & Maleki, A. A novel biodegradable magnetic bionanocomposite based on tannic acid as a biological molecule for selective oxidation of alcohols. Solid State Sci. 105, 106284 (2020).
Khamis, M., Gouda, G. A. & Nagiub, A. M. Biosynthesis approach of zinc oxide nanoparticles for aqueous phosphorous removal: Physicochemical properties and antibacterial activities. BMC Chem. 17, 1–22 (2023).
Nosrati, P., Rahimi, R. & Hosseini-Kharat, M. Investigation of antibacterial photodynamic inactivation in urea-doped TiO2 sensitized with porphyrin photocatalysis. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 27, 873–876 (2023).
Tang, M. et al. Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by a textured fluorinated alkoxyphosphazene surface. Bioact. Mater. 6, 447–459 (2021).
Ghilini, F., Pissinis, D. E., Minan, A., Schilardi, P. L. & Diaz, C. How functionalized surfaces can inhibit bacterial adhesion and viability. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 4920–4936 (2019).
Su, C., Ye, Y., Qiu, H. & Zhu, Y. Solvent-free fabrication of self-regenerating antibacterial surfaces resisting biofilm formation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 10553–10563 (2021).
Narayana, P. S. V. V. S. & Srihari, P. S. V. V. Biofilm resistant surfaces and coatings on implants: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 18, 4847–4853 (2019).
Wang, D. et al. Global expansion of Vibrio parahaemolyticus threatens the seafood industry: Perspective on controlling its biofilm formation. LWT 158, 113182 (2022).
Xu, L. & Siedlecki, C. A. Submicron topography design for controlling staphylococcal bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 110, 1238–1250 (2022).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Khalid, S., Gao, A., Wang, G., Chu, P. K. & Wang, H. Tuning surface topographies on biomaterials to control bacterial infection. Biomater. Sci. 8, 6840–6857 (2020).
Jiang, Y., Zhang, L., Wen, D. & Ding, Y. Role of physical and chemical interactions in the antibacterial behavior of ZnO nanoparticles against E. coli. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 69, 1361–1366 (2016).
Meng, J., Zhang, P. & Wang, S. Recent progress in biointerfaces with controlled bacterial adhesion by using chemical and physical methods. Chem. Asian J. 9, 2004–2016 (2014).
Yang, K. et al. Bacterial anti-adhesion surface design: Surface patterning, roughness and wettability: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 99, 82–100 (2022).
Desrousseaux, C., Sautou, V., Descamps, S. & Traoré, O. Modification of the surfaces of medical devices to prevent microbial adhesion and biofilm formation. J. Hosp. Infect. 85, 87–93 (2013).
Bazaka, K., Jacob, M. V., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. Efficient surface modification of biomaterial to prevent biofilm formation and the attachment of microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 95, 299–311 (2012).
Encinas, N. et al. Submicrometer-sized roughness suppresses bacteria adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 21192–21200 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kawai, K., Urano, M. & Ebisu, S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J. Prosthet. Dent. 83, 664–667 (2000).
Dou, X.-Q., Zhang, D., Feng, C. & Jiang, L. Bioinspired hierarchical surface structures with tunable wettability for regulating bacteria adhesion. ACS Nano 9, 10664–10672 (2015).
Perera-Costa, D., Bruque, J. M., González-Martín, M. L., Gómez-García, A. C. & Vadillo-Rodriguez, V. Studying the influence of surface topography on bacterial adhesion using spatially organized microtopographic surface patterns. Langmuir 30, 4633–4641 (2014).
Chen, J. et al. Urushiol-based benzoxazine copper polymer with low surface energy, strong substrate adhesion and antibacterial for marine antifouling application. J. Clean. Prod. 318, 128527 (2021).
Bazaka, K., Crawford, R. J. & Ivanova, E. P. Do bacteria differentiate between degrees of nanoscale surface roughness?. Biotechnol. J. 6, 1103–1114 (2011).
Moazzam, P., Razmjou, A., Golabi, M., Shokri, D. & Landarani-Isfahani, A. Investigating the BSA protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion of Al-alloy surfaces after creating a hierarchical (micro/nano) superhydrophobic structure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 104, 2220–2233 (2016).
Dewald, C. et al. Gold nanoparticle contact point density controls microbial adhesion on gold surfaces. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 163, 201–208 (2018).
Liu, B. H. & Yu, L.-C. In-situ, time-lapse study of extracellular polymeric substance discharge in Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 150, 98–105 (2017).
Orman, M. A. & Brynildsen, M. P. Inhibition of stationary phase respiration impairs persister formation in E. coli. Nat. Commun. 6, 7983 (2015).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lüdecke, C., Bossert, J., Roth, M. & Jandt, K. D. Physical vapor deposited titanium thin films for biomedical applications: Reproducibility of nanoscale surface roughness and microbial adhesion properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 280, 578–589 (2013).
Bartold, P. M. et al. Influence of surface roughness and shape on microdamage of the osseous surface adjacent to titanium dental implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22, 613–618 (2011).
Jang, S. R., Suh, I. W. & Heng, L. Nanoscale polishing technique of biomedical grade NiTi wire by advanced maf process: Relationship between surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J. Funct. Biomater. 14, 177 (2023).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Petrini, M. et al. Material characterization and bacterial interaction of titanium discs produced by selective laser melting. Mater. Charact. 189, 111989 (2022).
Chopra, D., Gulati, K. & Ivanovski, S. Understanding and optimizing the antibacterial functions of anodized nano-engineered titanium implants. Acta Biomater. 127, 80–101 (2021).
Jin, X. et al. Microstructure, corrosion and tribological and antibacterial properties of Ti–Cu coated stainless steel. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 50, 23–32 (2015).
Hemmatian, T., Lee, H. & Kim, J. Bacteria adhesion of textiles influenced by wettability and pore characteristics of fibrous substrates. Polymers (Basel) 13, 223 (2021).
Yuan, Y., Hays, M. P., Hardwidge, P. R. & Kim, J. Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv. 7, 14254–14261 (2017).
Maikranz, E. et al. Different binding mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus to hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces. Nanoscale 12, 19267–19275 (2020).
Yang, H. et al. Smart antibacterial surface made by photopolymerization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 28047–28054 (2016).
Bai, R. et al. Metallic antibacterial surface treatments of dental and orthopedic materials. Materials (Basel) 13, 4594 (2020).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sarraf, M., Rezvani Ghomi, E., Alipour, S., Ramakrishna, S. & Liana Sukiman, N. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-Des. Manuf. 5, 371–395 (2022).
Pantulap, U., Arango-Ospina, M. & Boccaccini, A. R. Bioactive glasses incorporating less-common ions to improve biological and physical properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 33, 1–41 (2022).
Etiemble, A. et al. Innovative Zr-Cu-Ag thin film metallic glass deposed by magnetron PVD sputtering for antibacterial applications. J. Alloys Compd. 707, 155–161 (2017).
Lou, B.-S. et al. High power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) for the fabrication of antimicrobial and transparent TiO2 thin films. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 36, 100782 (2022).
Karazmoudeh, N. J., Soltanieh, M. & Hasheminiasari, M. Structural and photocatalytic properties of undoped and Zn-doped CuO thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering. J. Alloys Compd. 947, 169564 (2023).
Sanzone, G. et al. Antimicrobial and aging properties of Ag-, Ag/Cu-, and Ag cluster-doped amorphous carbon coatings produced by magnetron sputtering for space applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 10154–10166 (2022).
Du, H. et al. Gold sputtering at the interfaces: An easily operated strategy for enhancing the energy storage capability of laminated polymer dielectrics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 17103–17112 (2023).
Chenab, K. K., Meymian, M.-R.Z. & Qashqay, S. M. Charge recombination suppression in dye-sensitized solar cells by tuning the dielectric constant of triphenylamine dyes with altering π-bridges from naphthalene to anthracene units. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 19595–19608 (2022).
Shiravand, M., Ghobadi, N. & Hatam, E. G. The investigation of structural, surface topography, and optical behaviors of Al-doped ZnO thin films with annealing temperature deposited by RF magnetron sputtering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 34, 713 (2023).
Khalilzadeh, S., Zamani Meymian, M. R. & Ghaffarinejad, A. Effect of radiofrequency power sputtering on silver-palladium nano-coatings for mild steel corrosion protection in 3.5% NaCl solution. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 29, 8406–8413 (2020).
Dastan, D. et al. Influence of nitrogen concentration on electrical, mechanical, and structural properties of tantalum nitride thin films prepared via DC magnetron sputtering. Appl. Phys. A 128, 400 (2022).
Alyousef, H. A., Hassan, A. M. & Zakaly, H. M. H. Exploring the impact of substrate placement on Cu3N thin films as a solar cell window layer: Structural and optical attributes. Mater. Today Commun. 35, 106183 (2023).
Ataie, S. A., Qashqay, S. M., Zamani-Meymian, M. R. & Ferreira, F. Effect of substrate bias voltage on microstructure and mechanical properties of Cr-Nb-Ti-Zr-NO ceramic thin films produced by reactive sputtering. Coatings 13, 1141 (2023).
Kim, H.-J., Jeong, Y.-H., Choe, H.-C. & Brantley, W. A. Surface morphology of TiN-coated nanotubular Ti–25Ta–xZr alloys for dental implants prepared by RF sputtering. Thin Solid Films 549, 131–134 (2013).
Anusha Thampi, V. V., Chukwuike, V. I., Shtansky, D. V. & Subramanian, B. Biocompatibility study of nanocomposite titanium boron nitride (TiBN) thin films for orthopedic implant applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 410, 126968 (2021).
Lopes, C. et al. Evolution of the mechanical properties of Ti-based intermetallic thin films doped with different metals to be used as biomedical devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 505, 144617 (2020).
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 22196:2011. Measurement of antibacterial activity on plastics and other non-porous surfaces. Plastics—Measurement of antibacterial activity on plastics surfaces: International Standard (2011).
International Organization for Standardization. ISO EN 10993–5 Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: In vitro methods (2009).
Adamiak, B. et al. Preparation of multicomponent thin films by magnetron co-sputtering method: The Cu-Ti case study. Vacuum 161, 419–428 (2019).
Awassa, J., Soulé, S., Cornu, D., Ruby, C. & El-Kirat-Chatel, S. Understanding the role of surface interactions in the antibacterial activity of layered double hydroxide nanoparticles by atomic force microscopy. Nanoscale 14, 10335–10348 (2022).
Eyal, Z. et al. Structural insights into species-specific features of the ribosome from the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, E5805–E5814 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Williams, L. B. Natural antibacterial clays: Historical uses and modern advances. Clays Clay Miner. 67, 7–24 (2019).
Bagherzadeh, M. et al. Bioengineering of CuO porous (nano) particles: Role of surface amination in biological, antibacterial, and photocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 12, 15351 (2022).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, X., Tang, J., Wang, L. & Liu, R. Mechanism of CuO nano-particles on stimulating production of actinorhodin in Streptomyces coelicolor by transcriptional analysis. Sci. Rep. 9, 11253 (2019).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Santo, C. E. et al. Bacterial killing by dry metallic copper surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 794–802 (2011).
Wojcieszak, D. et al. Influence of material composition on structure, surface properties and biological activity of nanocrystalline coatings based on Cu and Ti. Coatings 10, 343 (2020).
Stranak, V. et al. Ionized vapor deposition of antimicrobial Ti–Cu films with controlled copper release. Thin Solid Films 550, 389–394 (2014).
Zare-Bakheir, E., Ahghari, M. R., Maleki, A. & Ghafuri, H. Synthesis of Cu(OH)2 nanowires modified by Fe3O4@ SiO2 nanocomposite via green and innovative method with antibacterial activity and investigation of magnetic behaviours. R. Soc. Open Sci. 9, 212025 (2022).
ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yadav, L., Tripathi, R. M., Prasad, R., Pudake, R. N. & Mittal, J. Antibacterial activity of Cu nanoparticles against E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nano Biomed. Eng. 9, 9–14 (2017).
Mallick, S. et al. Iodine-stabilized Cu nanoparticle chitosan composite for antibacterial applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1313–1323 (2012).
Wu, S. et al. Role of the surface nanoscale roughness of stainless steel on bacterial adhesion and microcolony formation. ACS Omega 3, 6456–6464 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Delgado, A. et al. Establishment of an antifouling performance index derived from the assessment of biofouling on typical marine sensor materials. Sci. Total Environ. 887, 164059 (2023).
ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Prashanth, L., Kattapagari, KK, Chitturi, RT, Baddam, VRR & Prasad, LK A review on role of essential trace elements in health and disease.J.Dr.NTR Univ.Health Sci.4, 75–85 (2015).
Pino-Otín, M. R. et al. Antibiotic properties of Satureja montana L. hydrolate in bacteria and fungus of clinical interest and its impact in non-target environmental microorganisms. Sci. Rep. 12, 18460 (2022).
ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Shen, Y. & Haapasalo, M. Dental materials with antibiofilm properties. Dent. Mater. 30, e1–e16 (2014).
Raheem, N. & Straus, S. K. Mechanisms of action for antimicrobial peptides with antibacterial and antibiofilm functions. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2866 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zelver, N., Hamilton, M., Goeres, D. & Heersink, J. [24] development of a standardized antibiofilm test.In Methods in Enzymology Vol.337 (eds Zelver, N. et al.) 363–376 (Elsevier, 2001).
Luo, Y. & Song, Y. Mechanism of antimicrobial peptides: Antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antibiofilm activities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11401 (2021).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Junka, A. F. et al. ADAM test (antibiofilm dressing’s activity Measurement)—Simple method for evaluating anti-biofilm activity of drug-saturated dressings against wound pathogens. J. Microbiol. Methods 143, 6–12 (2017).
Hancock, R. E. W., Alford, M. A. & Haney, E. F. Antibiofilm activity of host defence peptides: Complexity provides opportunities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 786–797 (2021).
Pereira, R., dos Santos Fontenelle, RO, De Brito, EHS & De Morais, SM Biofilm of Candida albicans: Formation, regulation and resistance.J. Appl.Microbiol.131, 11–22 (2021).
Tang, J., Wu, Y., Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Sørensen, S. J. & Rittmann, B. E. How microbial aggregates protect against nanoparticle toxicity. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 1171–1182 (2018).
Monroe, D. Looking for chinks in the armor of bacterial biofilms. PLoS Biol. 5, e307 (2007).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mungkalasiri, J. et al. DLI-CVD of TiO2–Cu antibacterial thin films: Growth and characterization. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204, 887–892 (2009).
Stranak, V. et al. Deposition of thin titanium–copper films with antimicrobial effect by advanced magnetron sputtering methods. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 31, 1512–1519 (2011).
Yates, H. M. et al. Photo-induced self-cleaning and biocidal behaviour of Titania and copper oxide multilayers. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 197, 197–205 (2008).
Toubal, B., Elkourd, K., Bouab, R. & Abdelaziz, O. The impact of copper–cerium (Cu–Ce) addition on anatase-TiO2 nanostructured films for its inactivation of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 103, 549–564 (2022).
He, X. et al. Biocompatibility, corrosion resistance and antibacterial activity of TiO2/CuO coating on titanium. Ceram. Int. 43, 16185–16195 (2017).
Zhao, X. et al. A high-hydrophilic Cu2O-TiO2/Ti2O3/TiO coating on Ti-5Cu alloy: Perfect antibacterial property and rapid endothelialization potential. Biomater. Adv. 140, 213044 (2022).
He, B. et al. Biological performance and tribocorrosion behavior of in-situ synthesized CuxO/TiO2 coatings. Appl. Surf. Sci. 600, 154096 (2022).
The authors sincerely thank accommodation of the IUST in this research, especially Mr. Mohammad Tayebi and co-workers for their exceptional efforts and collaboration, as well as the support of Physics Research Lab services and Central Laboratories. We are grateful for the support of the Nanostructure Coatings Company, especially Mr. Mahdavi for their technical assistance in preparing the layers. A special thank you goes to Ms. Marjan Ostovar Esfandabadi for her significant contribution. The authors also appreciate the companionship of Alaa Nanotechnology Company in this research. Also, we have been benefited from the support of the Iran High-Tech Laboratory Network (Labsnet) in this research and for that we thank them.
Department of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran
Samaneh Mahmoudi-Qashqay, Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian & Seyed Javad Sadati
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
M.-R.Z.-M. Conceptualization, Methodology/Study design, Resources, Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation. S.M.-G. Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, preparation of figures. S.-J.S. Methodology/Study design. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Mahmoudi-Qashqay, S., Zamani-Meymian, MR. & Sadati, S.J. Improving antibacterial ability of Ti-Cu thin films with co-sputtering method. Sci Rep 13, 16593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43875-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43875-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)
Thin Layer Sputter System Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.